🎭

Module 10 - Manipulation, disinformation and hoaxes

When information is used to deceive

Introduction

In the previous modules, we learned to distinguish between facts and opinions, look for reasons, notice strong words, and compare different texts. Now we will look at situations where someone deliberately uses manipulation.

What is manipulation?

Manipulation is a way of communicating that attempts to influence our thinking or behaviour through emotions, fear or exaggeration. Manipulation often:

  • evokes strong feelings (fear, anger, enthusiasm),
  • uses simple and powerful statements,
  • does not reveal all the information.

The goal of manipulation is not to explain. The goal is to persuade without evidence.

How does manipulation work?

Manipulation often works with:

  • emotions instead of evidence,
  • simplifying complex issues,
  • expressions such as "everyone", "no one", "always", "definitely",
  • creating a sense of urgency.

For example:
"If we don't do this now, it will be too late."
Such statements can cause fear, but they may not be based on facts.

Not every mistake is manipulation

It is important to distinguish between:

Mistake
  • inaccurate information,
  • not intentional,
  • can be corrected.
Clickbait
  • headline exaggerates,
  • wants to attract attention,
  • content may not be untrue.
Manipulation
  • aims to influence emotions,
  • selects only part of reality,
  • may conceal important info.
Propaganda
  • systematic one-sided info,
  • aims to influence opinion,
  • often repeats the same message.

Not every inaccuracy is manipulation or an attack. Critical thinking means being able to distinguish between the two.

What is disinformation?

Disinformation is:

  • false or misleading information,
  • information that is spread deliberately.

Sometimes people share false information unknowingly. That is a mistake. Disinformation means the intent to deceive.

What is a hoax?

A hoax is false or fabricated information that spreads as truth. Hoaxes often:

  • evoke strong emotions,
  • ask us to share the information further,
  • do not cite a verifiable source.

Not every false report is intentional manipulation. Sometimes it is a mistake. But by sharing without verification, we can contribute to the spread of panic.

⚠️ Typical signs of a hoax

Pay attention if a message:

  • uses capital letters ("ATTENTION!!!"),
  • contains many exclamation marks,
  • calls for sharing,
  • claims that the media is silent about it,
  • refers to a "well-known acquaintance",
  • does not cite a specific source.

If you see these signs, slow down your thinking and verify the information first.

Three questions when reading a manipulative text

When you read or watch a strong statement, ask yourself:

  • Does this text evoke strong emotions?
  • Does it oversimplify a complex situation?
  • Does it not contain specific evidence?

If the answer is always yes, it is good to be cautious. Critical thinking means separating information from emotional reactions and checking whether the claim contains evidence. Strong emotions do not necessarily mean a strong argument.

📌 Summary

  • Manipulation attempts to influence our thinking or behaviour.
  • It often works with strong emotions instead of evidence.
  • It may use exaggeration or simplification of complex situations.
  • Emotions are not bad, but they should not make decisions for us.
  • Critical thinking means noticing emotions and asking: Is there any evidence?
  • When a text or information evokes a strong reaction, it is good to pay attention and think about it.

Practical exercises

✍️ Practical exercise 1: Read the text and think about the following questions.

A report has appeared on social media that the European Union is planning to ban certain types of common foods. According to this report, the new rules are to come into force as early as next month. The text does not cite a specific source or official document. The report urges readers to share it immediately before it is deleted.

Is this report credible?

👀 Show solution

No, the text does not cite a source and creates a sense of urgency. These are signs of suspicious information.

What signs of a hoax can you see?

👀 Show solution

No source is cited. Contains an urge to share. No specific official document is mentioned. Creates urgency.

What should you do?

👀 Show solution

Verify the information from another source before sharing it.

✍️ Practical exercise 2: Read the text and consider the following questions.

The European Union is introducing new environmental protection measures. These measures will affect the way some companies manufacture their products. This decision is further proof that the European Union is gradually restricting freedom of enterprise. If we do not take a stand against this quickly, small businesses will soon cease to exist.

Which parts of the text are informative?

👀 Show solution

The informative parts are: The European Union is introducing new environmental protection measures. This measure will affect the way some companies manufacture their products. These sentences describe the situation without evaluation or emotion.

Which parts have an emotional (manipulative) effect?

👀 Show solution

Emotionally manipulative parts are: "This decision is further proof that the EU is gradually restricting freedom of enterprise." and "If we do not take swift action against this, small businesses will soon cease to exist." These sentences lead to a strong conclusion, use fear-inducing language, and create a sense of urgency.

Does the text contain evidence?

👀 Show solution

No. The text cites no numbers, no sources, and does not explain why the measure should lead to a restriction of freedom or the end of small businesses.

Is there exaggeration in the text?

👀 Show solution

Yes. The claim "small businesses will soon cease to exist" is a very strong and absolute statement not supported by anything.

💡 Watch out for these sentences

  • "Wake up!"
  • "They are lying to you."
  • "It's clear evidence."
  • "Share before they delete it."

Such phrases often play on emotions rather than evidence. The fact that someone criticises a certain decision does not mean they are manipulating. The difference lies in whether they provide specific information, cite sources, and allow verification.

Naposledy změněno: pátek, 17. dubna 2026, 11.32